mirror of
https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk.git
synced 2026-09-05 15:41:23 +03:00
47b2c05e1d
WebSocket support folds into force_relay because a ws tunnel kills classic TCP/UDP punching — but that conflated transport necessity with relay policy, and the WebRTC decisions keyed off the merged flag: a ws client built no offerer at all without TURN, and only a Relay-only-ICE one with it. ws deployments could never reach a direct WebRTC connection, which is exactly the path they are supposed to live on. Split the flag. LoginConfigHandler now tracks policy_relay (the force-always-relay option, an explicit relay request — /r ids and retry-via-relay included — and proxy) separately; force_relay stays policy_relay || use_ws() and keeps governing the classic paths, so non-ws behavior is unchanged everywhere: - the offerer's existence and ICE policy follow policy_relay: under pure ws the offer gathers every candidate type and may go direct; under relay-by-policy it stays Relay-only ICE, TURN-gated, exactly as before; - the RelayResponse race applies the prefer-P2P window under ws (a direct ICE path is worth delaying an already-ready relay for) while policy relay keeps first-success semantics; - the request carries webrtc_all_ice (hbb_common 64b54ab) so the controlled side knows the offer is full-ICE: it answers with full ICE and no TURN requirement, while offers without the bit keep today's relay-only answer path on every version-skew combination. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ExUfAkYbq8UC9pQCiLy8TQ